Governance Forum

Decentralized decision-making and market curation

Committee-led curation

InterPredict uses a Decentralized Curation Committee to review new market proposals and maintain quality across the marketplace. Committee members evaluate proposals for clarity, fairness, and compliance with platform policies.

Submitting proposals

Users bring forward ideas for new prediction markets through the governance forum. Each proposal should clearly define outcomes, specify measurement methods, and explain why the event belongs on InterPredict.

Voting process

After submission, markets are reviewed and voted on by the committee. The forum is the place where discussion happens, concerns are raised, and committee reasoning is documented for transparency.

Community participation

The governance forum is designed for active community participation. Members can share insights, flag ambiguous questions, and recommend improvements before the market is accepted.

Dispute and finalization

Once a market is voted live, the forum remains the reference point for dispute resolution. Outcomes are finalized through transparent evidence review and committee consensus.

Why governance matters

Strong governance ensures markets are fair, trusted, and aligned with the decentralized ethos of InterPredict. It also makes the platform resilient against low-quality or misleading speculation.